Ultralight Hiking for Photographers Part 1 - Climate, Materials and the Big Three

 
 

Hiking and photography is the perfect combination, making it possible to get to remote and unique locations and capturing them for others to enjoy. But it's also very easy to end up lugging around a massive pack, with all that heavy photography gear we have to bring. Luckily nowadays with new materials, smart designs, and knowledge, it's possible to carry that camera gear and still have a light pack, without having to compromise on safety or comfort. In this multi part blog post I will go through some of my tips and tricks, as well as recommended gear to getting a base weight under 10kg inc. camera gear.

Of course there is nothing wrong with carrying 20kg+ loads, people have done it for years but lightening your load will allow you to trek further and on more tricky terrain, as well as conserving your energy for when you get to your campsite and need to go out and capture images. You don't need to be a sherpa!

Climate

So one of the first things to consider before a trip, is what the climate is like.  It is important to do your research prior to a trip and find out what the average temps, wind speed and rain will be like. This will allow you to tailor your gear for the climate and not take unnecessary items. If you aren't familiar with a locations climate, try speak with a local or look at  the BOM's climate data. Knowing what gear to use when can be tricky and comes down to experience. Especially if you are familiar with a location. But generally if it's an alpine environment close to winter, I will still take my winter tent because of high winds being likely or when camping in exposed locations, such as in the Southwest National Park in Tasmania, where high winds are frequent.

I like to split my gear into two lists; summer (three season) and winter (four season). Then I slightly customise each for specific trips. Below is my gear list broken down into these two categories, as well as my excel doc you can use as a template. It's very handy to have a gear breakdown like this to easily see what items are adding the most to your pack weight and knowing your pack weight prior to a trip. 

Material Tech

One of the best ways to reduce weight is making the most of the latest innovations in materials. This will let you save weight and generally not sacrifice on durability and strength but unfortunately if you are on a tight budget, I'd stick to the classic materials, as low production, modern materials can be very expensive. 

Dyneema: One of the most popular UL material is Dyneema Composite Fabric (formerly Cuben Fiber). Which is an incredibly strong and durable fiber. It has great tear, puncture and abrasion performance, as well as being waterproof, allowing for light packs, tents, dry backs, guylines to be made. 

Titanium & Carbon Fiber: Another great material with amazing strength (1400 MPa) is titanium . It's great for tent stakes and cooking gear, generally around half the weight of equivalent alumni gear. Especially for winter stakes, as it wont stick to snow as much as aluminum, making it a lot easier to remove the next morning. Also carbon fiber is great for trekking poles, stakes and three season tent poles with unidirectional CF, allowing it to flex. 

Merino, Synthetics & Gore-tex: Merino, synthetics and waterproof membranes continue to improve. In part 2 I will go into more detail about the pros and cons of both merino and synthetics. Nuyarn Merino is the latest and greatest. While it still uses merino wool, it's a new way of making it. With 35% more loft, 35% stretchier, dries 5x faster, 35% warmer 47% stronger and 120% tougher seams (according to AgResearch). Although there are still a limited amount of manufactures using it and the current ones avaible are expensive. 
It's very easy to make a waterproof fabric but to also make it durable and breathable is challenging. Gore-tex continues to lead but It's worth keeping an eye on eVent and softshell layers as they continue to improve.

950+ Down: 950+ goose down has only recently arose and will provide the best warmth for the weight on the market. The higher the loft value, the more insulation it will provide for the same weight. 

Big Three

Your tent, backpack and sleeping system is the easiest and best place to start saving significant weight. As you can get major weight savings but it is also the most expensive items. UL gear doesn't have to be expensive but these items big items will generally be very pricey if you want major weight savings, unless you make it yourself or sacrifice durability.

Tent

It's best to own two tents for three season and four season use. It's hard to make a tent that will take high winds and snow loading without being generally twice as heavy as a 3 season tent, although the Hyperlite Mountain Gear Ultamid 2 does a good job. To pack more efficiently, it's worth carrying the poles separately, so you pack them in between other gear or inside your tripod legs. I always like to use a two man tent, even when going solo, as if the weather is bad, it's worth the extra weight to have that space but you can save even more weight by using a one man tent.

An easy mod to do to tents is replace the stock guylines and pegs, as these usually aren't very good. I like to use Z-Line Dyneema 1.5mm cord (200lbs), 15cm Ti or CF stakes for my 3 season tent and Z-Line Slick Dyneema 2.2mm (650lb) and Ti snow stakes (deadman style) for my 4 season tent. Another mod for 3 season tents is carbon fiber Fibraplex poles, which are around half the weight of standard DAC aluminium poles but it's not cheap.

For winter use I'd recommend sticking with a tunnel or pyramid tent design unless you leave your tent for long periods of time (snow loading) and set it up on rocks frequently (freestanding). Dome tents don't handle strong winds as well as a tunnel tent in my opinion, so they generally will weight more for the same wind resistance because they will need more poles for the same usable internal space. Downside to a tunnel is vertical wind/snow loading, tent should be orientated into the wind for best performance and it's not freestanding. But as a pure winter tent, I find these issues to be minor. An easy mod I've done for vertical loading is having internal guys that brace the poles from horizontal movement when it's very windy or snowing heavily. You can use your skis, poles, snowshoes, etc for solid pegs and also put your snow pegs in deadman style on the four main corners. 

Recommendations

Backpack

Prior to finding your ideal pack, it's necessary to have a generally idea what load you expect to carry. As the pack needs to be designed to distribute this load to your hips properly. Having a gear list, will help get an estimate for your pack weight.

Make sure you get a large enough capacity, so you don't have to have gear dangling off your bag, which will get caught on things and are prone to damage. I've used photography specific backpacks, such as the F-stop Tilopa but they compromise on proper load distribution in my opinion with the back entry and foam padding , as well as they are very heavy. You can also slightly reduce your current packs weight but trimming straps to the length you need and removing items you never use (top hood, external carry loops).

Dry bag style packs made out of Dyneema are the best in my opinion, simple and effective design and it includes your first layer of waterproofing. If your pack isn't watertight, I'd recommend using trash bags. Either use thin trash bags and replace them for each trip or get a tough heavier bag and use it multiple times. I don't like using pack covers as they get caught on bushes too easily and blow off in the wind. My second waterproofing defense, are Zpacks Dyneema dry bags. This also helps keep my gear organised into four small bags (Sleeping bag, tent, food and clothing).

Recommendations

Sleeping System

As with the tent, I think it's ideal to have two sleeping bags, one for summer and one for winter temperatures. It's a big investment to purchase two but it's worthwhile in the end.

As mentioned in material tech, 950 down is the best option for weight-efficient warmth, however there are relatively few options available with this material for now and you will find the almost-as-good 900 down much more widely available and the weight difference is very minor. Downtek coatings helps to make down more resistant to absorbing moisture but it's still not perfect, so you need to be super careful to not get it wet, as it will lose it's loft and intern not provide you with insulation. For a summer bag, a hood isn't necessary, so it's an easy way to reduce the weight. 
The new style of sleeping bag is the quilt, with a very versatile design, some allowing you to unzip them flat and a significant weight reduction. The main weight reduction is from eliminating the hood and not fully wrapping the down around you. The downsides to this are minimal, as you usually carry a beanie and a hood is only need in extreme winter conditions in my opinion. Also the lack of down between you and your mattress isn't necessary, as the down is compress and has nearly no insulation due to no air gap.

In my opinion easily the best and most popular mattress is the Thermarest Neo Air Xlite for 3 season use and Xtherm for 4 season use. It's very light, comfy and great warmth for an air mattress. Only downside is the insulating foil layer internally is a bit noisy and it's expensive. If you are on a budget, a foam mattress will do the job.

Recommendations

Next

I hope you found this first part beneficial and there are plenty more topics still to cover, such as;

  • Cooking,

  • H2O,

  • clothing,

  • shoes,

  • photography gear,

  • ditty bag,

  • navigation,

  • alpine touring gear,

  • and much more.

 

Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm f/4 ZA OSS

 

I wrote this quick review on November 11th 2014 for the Focus group website but due to exams, I didn't have time to reformat it and post it here. It's a bit late but I thought it's still worth sharing. My current opinion is, this lens pretty much doesn't come off the a7R, I just love how compact and versatile the lens is. 

"Focus Sponsor Sony Australia lent the Focus group the only pre-production model of the Sony Zeiss 16-35mm f/4 FE in Australia. Images with this lens were captured by John Armytage using his A7R and the raw files were sent to gear nerd Chris Wiewiora for analysis. This is what Chris found from his lens performance review.

John Armytage asked me to review the unreleased Sony/Zeiss (Zony) 16-35mm f/4 FE that he has been using. Although it is tricky to make a proper assessment from just viewing a few brick wall RAW files, I can get a general idea of its performance.

This lens is designed for the Sony Full Frame E-Mount for cameras such as the Sony A7, A7r and A7s. The main specs that stand out are the 518g weight, compact size (for an ultra wide angle retrofocus lens design) and great build quality, with an all metal body (including the zoom and focus ring). My benchmark was the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L, as it’s the best performing 16-35mm released at the moment in my opinion.

 
 

From the lovely brick wall shots John took, the corner performance is impressive, especially at the wide end. Its peak performance seems to be around the mid focal range but the wide end is surprisingly good comparatively. The corners at 35mm look okay but overall sharpness starts to suffer. Compared to the Nikon 16-35mm f/4, Nikon 17-35mm f/2.8, Canon 17-40mm f/4L and Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L performance looks better. Now compared to the Canon 16-35mm f/4 which is a superb lens, it’s much harder to evaluate, as they are so similar. From the full res images I have seen taken with the Canon @ 16mm on the A7R, the Sony looks on par if not better. I haven’t seen any images taken at other focal lengths, so I can’t make that judgment but they have similar IQ characteristics throughout the focal range.

The distortion looks reasonable at 16mm relative to the rest but although I couldn’t see for myself, I have read that past 24mm there is a bit of pincushion distortion. I couldn’t see any field curvature at 16mm and 24mm but there were hints of it around 35mm. Thankfully it has a reasonably decent sun star, with nice thin diffraction rays at f/22 seen in the image at the end of the review. There is a bit of chromatic aberration but CA is an easy fix in ACR/Lightroom. Vignetting doesn’t look bad but due to the small 72mm filter thread, you don’t want to stack too many filters and I’d recommend using a wide angle adapter.

Here are some 100% crops with no sharpening applied except for ACR standard (25).

 

Size comparison between the Sony 16-35mm on the Sony a7R, Canon 16-35mm on the 5DIII and Nikon 16-35mm on the D800. I was unable to put the Canon or Nikon lens on the a7R with a metabones adapter/novoflex on "camerasize", so keep in mind the Canon and nikon bodies are thicker and the mounts aren't inline with the a7R's mount. Screenshot from, http://camerasize.com

 

Thank you Sony Australia for lending the focus group the only pre-production lens in Australia for testing.

Shortly after writing the review, I ordered my own copy and it arrived today. My first physical impression of the lens is how light and compact it is. It nearly feels like the lens is hollow but most of all how well built it is. The all metal body including focus and zoom ring blends perfectly with the A7 range of cameras but also increases the durability of the lens. I’m also impressed with the nice resistance in the focus run but especially the zoom ring. Hopefully this means the lens has quality seals for when the front element extends when zooming out towards 16mm.

Chris Wiewióra

Chris is an amateur landscape photographer, gear guru, and was Focus Rookie of the Year in 2012. He is based in Kiama, NSW."

http://focusphotographers.org/lens-review-sony-zeiss-16-35mm